The Times They Are A-Interestin’

Last night as we were watching the telly I turned suddenly to OH and said: ‘We’re living through history!’ That’s always true I suppose but right now there’s no denying we are in the midst of cataclysmic happenings. Brexit is the least of it. There’s the obvious dreaded lurgy paralysing the world and in the US the situation is on a knife-edge as we wait to see what will happen. Will Trump be impeached again? Will they be able to prise him from the White House before inauguration day like a thick cork blocking a champagne bottle? Will he face judgment for his alleged crimes? And on the day itself, what will happen? Will there be a peaceful transfer of power or will violent demonstrations wreck the day? Will the police be adequately prepared? I guess if last week’s insurrection achieved one thing it was as a wake-up call; if the authorities are not ready this time there’s no excuse for them.

Another thing that was abundantly clear after last week’s insurgence was the difference in the way black and white protestors are treated. Commentator after commentator – including Biden himself – pointed out the gulf between the violent, heavy-handed police response to the BLM protests – which were a protest, not an insurrection – and the tepid reaction to the armed, mostly white mob which descended on the Capitol. And it happened that when I turned to OH and said ‘We’re living through history’ we were watching a programme on BBC Scotland about that very topic. Scotland, Slavery and Statues dealt with the controversy over the Melville Monument in Edinburgh to one Henry Dundas. Dundas was an aristocrat who made a great deal of money from businesses using slave labour and who is placed atop the largest monument in the capital, a sort of Scottish Nelson’s column.

Melville Monument, Edinburgh - Wikipedia

But nowhere on the plaque was his connection to slavery mentioned; neither was the clause he inserted into Wilberforce’s Anti-Slavery Bill which slowed the progress of abolition and arguably resulted in thousands more losing their liberty and lives. Campaigners had been trying for years to get the plaque changed but met with resistance from the council and from a campaign by the Dundas family maintaining that he was essentially a pragmatist and an abolitionist at heart, and that the clause he inserted saved the bill rather than undermining it. The programme interviewed campaigners and historians on both sides and the longer it went on the more complex the arguments became and the harder it seemed to get at the truth. Enter – or rather, exit – George Floyd (RIP) and the BLM movement. This was a turning-point: once the statue of Edward Colston had been toppled the Melville Monument looked to be next in the firing-line. Edinburgh Council did a complete volte-face, produced a new plaque mentioning Dundas’s part in the slave trade and despite the family’s protests, said that was the end of the story.

I may come back to this complex narrative in another post because arguments that history is being ‘altered’ (as though it were already perfect) need to be dealt with more substantially.

After all that we were in need of some comedy so finished the second series of the highly amusing Staged. I’ll probably come back to this at some point too.

Interesting times…

Happy Wednesday.

Kirk out

5 thoughts on “The Times They Are A-Interestin’

  1. I dread to think what’ll happen on 20th but it might go smoothly, who knows? Although I absolutely do blame the different policing levels on racism, I’m not sure I’d also blame their failure on 20th on that, because there’s a huge armed population in the US and they’re going to outnumber the National Guard or whoever else is responsible by far. That’s not to say the military/police won’t be culpable in some way. There are just scenarios which wouldn’t really be their fault.

    There are people who say that Wilberforce was partly against the slave trade because he had financial interests in the Baltic rather than the Atlantic. The more I find out about this, the more I realise that nautical considerations are significant. For instance, Portugal pioneered the Atlantic slave trade because their ports faced Afrika, and the current countries of the Gulf of Guinea are clearly set up along rivers and seem to be to do with what can be exported from them, each specialising in a separate commodity, including humans. There’s also the issue of Haïti.

    But anyway, yes, historic times I think.

  2. I am so loving Staged. It keeps getting better, if that’s possible: it’s deliciously, literally laugh-out loud funny, which is such a tonic right now. Cheers, Jon.

  3. I became heavily involved in the statue debate when the Confederate statues were removed in America. I got bogged down in it in my other blog. But at the risk of being bogged down once again, I will ask the same question. How far back do we go? The Pyramids were built using slaves. Ancient Greece and the Roman Empire were both founded on slavery. At some stage, we have to accept that it was the way things were then, and instead of destroying evidence of it, we should learn from it.
    Or they will be demolishing the Coliseum next.
    Best wishes, Pete.

  4. I agree that it’s not about destroying evidence but learning from it and I think that’s exactly the point. I’m not in favour of the wholesale toppling of statues but of changing our relationship with them so that those who profited from slavery are not honoured without putting it in that context. We know full well the pyramids were built using slave labour but many people didn’t know about Henry Dundas, nor did the monument plaque educate them

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s