Trick or Treat?

OH and I spent the last couple of nights watching Trick, a drama about the so-called Climategate scandal of 2009. My memories of the event are somewhat hazy (let’s face it, my memories of just about everything are somewhat hazy) but I have to say, after watching it we were still none the wiser. It starred Jason Watkins, who rises in my esteem every time I see him, as Phil Jones, a highly dedicated and respected climate scientist whose emails were hacked, then presented out of context to a cohort of press and climate change deniers who used them to discredit his work.

It all centred on the word ‘trick’. In a scientific context this means a particular way of looking at data in order to get a more reliable view. But taken out of context and inserted into a tabloid it seemed like evidence of fraud. So far, so understandable. But while the story was moving it didn’t really tell us much about what actually happened, focusing instead on the pain and shame which nearly drove a good man to suicide. He was cleared in the end but reckoned the whole episode had put back the cause of climate change by ten years – ten years we could ill afford to lose.

It’s worth watching but probably a good idea to view the accompanying documentary first.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/m0010s10/the-trickhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episodes/m0010s10/the-trick

https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000b8p2/climategate-science-of-a-scandalhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m000b8p2/climategate-science-of-a-scandal

Kirk out

2 thoughts on “Trick or Treat?

  1. I’m afraid I didn’t have the stamina to watch the documentary, but watching the dramatised story was difficult enough, having experienced anxiety myself: I can only begin to feel how traumatic the whole episode must have been for Phil Jones, and the drama served to illustrate what a consummate actor Jason Watkins is. Climate science is incredibly complex, and I think the discrediting of worrying results by fossil fuel producers because of vested interests is beneath contempt, but that is part of a pattern, as mentioned in the drama, of manipulation of the public, which has been well-honed over decades. Cheers, Jon.

  2. I have recorded this, as I agree that Watkins keeps getting better and better. I plan to watch it when my wife is out, as it will bore her to tears.
    Best wishes, Pete.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s